The 28th issue of Phoenix Weekly in 2013 published a 10-page article that maliciously defamed H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha out of thin air. The lengthy article portrayed H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha as a religious fraudster, claiming that his organizations and disciples were accomplices in his religious scams. The same media group, Phoenix Net, also published defamatory articles online in support of this narrative. For those who know H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, this false report is laughable and completely nonsensical; however, for ordinary readers who are unaware, it can have a very negative impact. People naturally accept the information conveyed in the article while reading, leading them to immediately deny the subject of the report. Perhaps later, some may rationally think there is a problem, but most people are unlikely to actively seek verification and would not expect that a reputable media outlet like Phoenix Weekly would publish such a blatant lie. Churchill once said: "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." Phoenix Weekly is the one rushing around with lies. Lies cannot withstand scrutiny and verification and will ultimately be exposed. The author believes that the best way to express oneself is to speak the truth; everyone has their own wisdom, and even if misled or blinded for a time, there will always come a moment of clarity and discovery of the truth. This article will analyze the report of Phoenix Weekly in the order it was presented. In response to its viewpoints, the author will raise reasonable doubts and provide the true situation. The content of this article has been collaboratively investigated by many people, obtaining firsthand information about H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, so it is authentic and not afraid of verification. The author will analyze the content published by Phoenix Weekly one by one, and the truth will naturally become clear.
1. Who is Phoenix Weekly speaking for?#
Before delving into specific analyses, it is necessary to objectively and logically analyze the clues in the article to find an answer: What is Phoenix Weekly trying to do? What is the true intention behind this? Logically speaking, a magazine as influential as Phoenix Weekly should strive for truthfulness, credibility, and objectivity when reporting on serious issues involving religion. However, the reality is quite the opposite; the article is filled with derogatory descriptions and negative vocabulary, guiding and implying to readers that they should develop negative feelings towards the subject of the report. The entire article lacks real evidence and reasonable analysis and discussion: some matters could be verified with a little research, yet no investigation was conducted; some conclusions that have long been established were not adopted; some facts are indisputable truths, such as H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's thirty major achievements, real evidence, and honors worldwide, which were deliberately erased. There is only a one-sided narrative based on assumptions, with no interviews or opportunities provided for H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha or his various sects to explain relevant issues, lacking any reasonable process of normal news reporting. Furthermore, even the author's true identity—special contributor Wang Jialiang—is shrouded in mystery, using a pseudonym. For an article targeting a famous figure and significant events, the author is essentially anonymous, which is perplexing. In the world, there is no effect without a cause, nor is there a cause without an effect. The article from Phoenix Weekly has an unreliable author and false evidence, intentionally and maliciously damaging H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's reputation for what purpose? If it is a journalist's ethical duty to expose the truth, then the article's intention should be serious and earnest, the content objective and accurate, and there should be real reporters, detailed interview records, specific facts, and ample witness testimonies, but Phoenix Weekly lacks all of these. Since it is not out of the inherent responsibilities of news reporting but rather publishes false statements extensively, the only conclusion one can draw is that Phoenix Weekly is a mouthpiece for certain individuals or organizations, attacking H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Who would do such a thing? The suspects could be official or unofficial. If it is official, then it is government-directed. If it is a government action, considering the official's ability to collect various materials, how could there be no detailed information or specific witness testimonies disclosed? With an official background, witnesses would certainly be open and legitimate. However, the entire article lacks any powerful individuals or information, and the logic throughout is chaotic, with extremely imprecise wording, engaging in rampant defamation, which does not meet the qualifications to speak on behalf of the government. Speaking on behalf of the government should be reasonable and legal, with rigorous explanations and detailed evidence; otherwise, damaging the government's credibility is a minor issue, while the greater consequence is tarnishing the government's image. Therefore, these two defamatory articles are not authorized by the government at all. Some who have read the articles mistakenly speculate that this is the government's intention to attack H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, but in reality, they have fallen into a trap, wrongfully accusing the government, whether central or Hong Kong, of being unjustly blamed. The purpose of this article is to hide the true instigators, and they hope the public will believe this is a government action. The intention behind this article is to create momentum, sending the message that Phoenix Weekly's voice attacking H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is the government's will. Unfortunately, the true instigators have not done their homework well; they want to act but cannot, for the simple reason that they are opponents of the government and cannot possibly understand the government's thoughts. They merely wish to deceive, and they can fool most viewers who will not seek verification. Unfortunately, they have exposed too many flaws; it does not take much effort to uncover the people behind it. When one looks back at the recent articles praising H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha from the People's Daily, Xinhua Net, and the State Council's China Net, it becomes clear that official directives can be ruled out, whether from the central government or the Hong Kong government. Therefore, it must be unofficial behavior. Given such reporting, it is hard to believe that the side represented by Phoenix Weekly holds no hatred towards H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Who could harbor such hatred? From the article, it seems that the so-called victims of the fraud case, Liu Juan and Liu Baihang, who have personal grievances against H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, represent this article. Clearly not, as both of these so-called victims in the fraud case publicly stated they were not defrauded, and Phoenix Weekly's explanation of this matter is also not detailed, merely glossing over it, so this personal grievance rationale does not hold. So who exactly wants to deny H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha and his status? It is neither official nor personal grievances; the article directly points to religious fraud and uses a large amount of text to convey a viewpoint: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's religious identity is false, and he has no Buddhist identity at all. All identities, including the current title of H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha and the previous title of "His Holiness the Great King of Tantric Buddhism," are not real. According to Phoenix Weekly's report, the title of Buddha is self-proclaimed; the identity of the Dharma King was obtained with the help of two Taiwanese individuals. If these two reasons hold, regardless of whether H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha has committed heinous acts, it cannot be accepted. Who has the qualification and ability to confirm that he has no religious identity? Naturally, it should be authoritative Buddhist organizations! If H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha uses a fabricated Buddhist identity to deceive sentient beings, this is something that any Buddhist temple, religious group, or Dharma King, Rinpoche, or eminent monk with verified virtue and realization cannot tolerate, and exposing his deceptive behavior is an undeniable responsibility. It should be announced justly to the world, and it should naturally specify their authoritative identities, such as what temple, great monk, Dharma King, Rinpoche, or religious group. So which Buddhist organizations and famous Buddhist figures played such a righteous role? What are their identities, and what are their reasons for opposing or denying? Once these questions are resolved, perhaps we will have a clearer concept of who is behind Phoenix Weekly and who they represent. Throughout the article, the Buddhist organization cited by Phoenix Weekly is named "a certain Tibetan religious foundation," representing the Tibetan Buddhist exiled government, and its head is called Dawa Tsairen, who "directly denounced the Yiyun Gao group as a fraud group." The Dharma King cited by Phoenix Weekly is the Sakya Dharma King, a standing committee member of the exiled government, who stated in an interview with Taiwanese media that he has never certified 'the Third Vajra Holder Buddha'; the living Buddha cited is the "Tangrang Jiewa Living Buddha" from the Tashi Lhunpo Monastery in Tibet, who believes that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha does not conform to Tibetan Buddhism in appearance, and there are issues just by looking at the photo; a netizen cited is a Buddhist named Wu Feilong, whose real name is Wu Honghai, whose online name is "Buddhist Knowledge," and who has long defamed H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, reportedly suffering from mental illness; and another defector from H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's system, known as "Mr. Gao," is a so-called deceived businessman who is actually suspected of committing a crime. In total, there are five sources of evidence. It is not difficult to see that in proving H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraud, Phoenix Weekly's work is quite lazy, totaling only five sources, including netizens, which is rather thin. However, it does not matter; if H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's side claims, then he has no evidence at all, while five sources are still not few; unfortunately, the documents certifying, endorsing, and congratulating H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's identity exceed 60. This comparative number is unfavorable to Phoenix Weekly. Quantity cannot win; although the evidence is thin, perhaps the institutions and people speaking have weight, which is also acceptable. Among these five pieces of evidence, the most weighty are the so-called Tibetan religious foundation claiming to represent Tibetan Buddhism and the Sakya Dharma King. Although few, they carry significant weight, as representatives and Dharma Kings of Tibetan Buddhism! Finally, the important figures make their appearance; the true face and full name of this Tibetan foundation, whose head is Dawa Tsairen (a key member of the Dalai Lama's exiled government), is—the Dalai Lama Tibetan Religious Foundation!!! Such a world-renowned Buddhist organization exposing a Buddhist fraud is only natural; why does Phoenix Weekly quote its statement yet dare not publicly report its name, instead using a "certain" character to replace it? What reason makes Phoenix feel that the words "Dalai Lama" would be fatal? The reason is likely that all clear-eyed people will understand at this point. So, does the Dalai Lama have a grudge against H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha? A simple search will reveal that the Dalai group has been attacking H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha since 2010 or even earlier, with evidence to support it. The reason H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha has been consistently targeted by the Dalai Lama's group is due to his identity as a Buddha incarnate! The logic is simple: if a Buddha has descended, still the Vajra Holder Buddha, the supreme Dharma King of the Dharma realm has arrived, how could your self-proclaimed Tibetan Buddhist representative hold any weight? This is truly embarrassing; overnight, the Dalai Lama's claimed and self-identified Tibetan Buddhist representative loses all significance. What does this concept mean? The first question is clear; the second matter regarding the Sakya Dharma King is simple. The certification written in 2006 was published in a publicly published book in 2008. When the first edition was published, the publisher sent 100 copies to Sakya Tianjin, as well as to all the living Buddhas and Dharma Kings who had written certifications and congratulations. Everyone was very happy and praised it. Until the end of 2012, under pressure from the Dalai Lama, the Sakya Dharma King publicly stated that he had never certified the Third Vajra Holder Buddha. Here, the rights and wrongs will be explained later. Up to this point, among the only five pieces of evidence denying H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's identity, the two most weighty ultimately point to the same person—the Dalai Lama. The true instigator behind this article from Phoenix Weekly has finally emerged. Objectively speaking, even if Phoenix Weekly is a gunman for the Dalai group, they still have the right to disclose the truth and explain the facts. Even if they do not want to reveal their true identity, if the content is true, it would still be an objective report. But how about the authenticity of the content? Is it really reasonable and evidence-based, or is it a bunch of nonsense? Does it conform to the Dalai group's consistent style of being unscrupulous for profit, daring to disregard cause and effect, reversing black and white, confusing right and wrong, obliterating morality, and violating precepts? The author will analyze each matter, and readers with affinity will discern for themselves. It would be impolite not to reciprocate; the following title is: The Fallen Weekly—Phoenix Weekly's Secret Exposure, a Major Uncovering of the Holy.
【The International Buddhist Monastic Association and several legitimate sects held a press conference in Hong Kong to testify against and condemn the defamation by Phoenix Weekly.】
2. The Fallen Weekly—Phoenix Weekly's Secret Exposure, a Major Uncovering of the Holy#
(1) Phoenix Weekly fabricates lies: This "Dorje Chang Buddha" is a fraudster who has been wanted in China for over ten years and has fled to the United States.
Reasonable doubt: This sentence firmly determines a person's criminal identity. Fraud is a clear crime that should be determined by a court after a trial. Only after a court verdict declaring someone guilty of fraud can that person be called a fraudster. Before a court ruling, no one can be labeled a criminal; this is a basic human rights principle and a legal definition. Phoenix Weekly surely knows this. So, may I ask Phoenix Weekly, which country's court has determined this person to be guilty of fraud? Where is the verdict?
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha has never been subject to any criminal prosecution by any country's court, nor has he ever faced civil litigation, let alone a conviction. The International Criminal Police Organization once received a request from a member country to issue a wanted notice for H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, but years later, that member country actively requested the withdrawal of the wanted notice. After a long investigation, the International Criminal Police Organization officially withdrew the wanted notice and the entire case in October 2008 during the 72nd meeting of the "International Criminal Police Organization Document Control Committee," issuing a formal notification to all member countries not to detain H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. At the same time, H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha also received a notification document, but he never used it to show others and did not take the rampant rumors of defamation to heart.
(2) One of Phoenix Weekly's headlines: The Fugitive "Living Buddha" Returns. Phoenix Weekly: Under this title, the article introduces the process of hearing H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings, the international organizations registered overseas under H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held in Hong Kong, the total number of disciples of H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, and the online promotion of H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, stating that the followers of H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha praise and promote their respected teacher online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster, all his actions and those of his organizations and individuals are fraudulent. However, why H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha is a fraudster is merely one-sided rhetoric from Phoenix Weekly, with no evidence to prove this viewpoint. This is logically untenable; the major premise is false. In the Buddhist logical reasoning, it is also untenable; there is only a conclusion without any supporting evidence, which creates a fictitious premise, leading to a judgment without substance, resulting in a hollow lie.
Factual situation: H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings are completely open for anyone with affinity to hear; there is no secret "transmission of teachings." The teachings expound the doctrines of Shakyamuni Buddha and the teachings of the Three Buddhas, including the teachings of the First Dorje Chang Buddha; the content of the teachings is harmonious and aligns with the scriptures and principles, providing significant benefits to the listeners. Various qualified masters, living Buddhas, and eminent monks worldwide are teaching, and the world is filled with various mediums for teaching, such as recordings, videos, books, and CDs. Phoenix Weekly has overlooked this, insisting that H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's teachings have significant influence, with many followers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. "Currently, this fraud group in monk's robes has secretly 'transmitted teachings' across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and almost throughout the entire Chinese community."
Reasonable doubt: There are countless practitioners studying Buddhism under temples, Buddhist groups, and various Buddhist sects worldwide, which Phoenix Weekly did not mention; every year, numerous Buddhist ceremonies are held worldwide in various forms and on a large scale, which Phoenix Weekly ignored; followers of various Buddhist sects, temples, and eminent monks praise and promote their respected teachers online, to which Phoenix Weekly has no objection; Phoenix Weekly acknowledges events happening worldwide, yet only denies the number of followers following H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha, the Buddhist conference held by the International Buddhist Monastic Association, and the actions of praising and promoting H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha. Why specifically target this? Is there a reasonable reason for this? The answer is that Phoenix Weekly considers H.H. the Third Dorje Chang Buddha's organization to be a "fraud group in monk's robes," so criticizing the Dalai at last year's Hong Kong conference and suing the Dalai's exiled government representative in Taiwan were both inappropriate actions. The logic fabricated by Phoenix Weekly is that because H.H